|
Finished editing really long podcast file, need to take a break. About 17 hours ago.
Drove to band practice, listened to Minutemen CD in the car. "Tour spiel!" About 14 hours ago.
Gotta write my column. But what to write about? Wait, I know! Less than 20 seconds ago.
Well that's enough Twittering for now. Oh, you don't know what Twittering is? It's the latest in utterly self-indulgent Web 2.0 fun.
At Twitter.com, millions of people are constantly answering one question: What are you doing right now? It's sort of like a blog but without all of that, you know, actual content.
As I look at Twitter.com right now, some of the fascinating content includes a person going to get Indian food, someone waiting to get into a breakfast joint and a guy who has just signed up for DirecTV. Wow! What will happen next?
I have to admit that Twitter is one of those things that makes me feel like an old fogy. Even though I'm a cutting-edge, tech kinda guy, the whole constant-connection thing is one that just doesn't connect with me.
But I can definitely understand why this is a hit with the younger crowd. Every sub-25-year-old that I know is constantly on his or her cell phone, and the subject of 99 percent of the calls is similar to Twitter's content: "Hey, whatcha doin?" "Nothing, what are you doing?" "Watching Futurama." "Cool, talk to you later."
Heck, if Twitter cuts down on even half of the calls like that, it's doing society a great service.
Click here to read the full article |
Comments (2)
right now we obsessed with communities and to explore each and every aspect of life on common platform -- web2 has brought great revolution and may help us to understand true meaning of democracy whereas debate is still on for level of freedom and moderators right
Posted by Shashank Garg | June 11, 2007 11:42 AM
I think Mr. Rapoza missed the opportunity to comment on one particular viewpoint of this entire debate -- the idea of choice in the matter of privacy and publication. Yes, it is true that people are loosening up as to what they talk about in public forums, details that they transmit to their friends and family, and ideas that they throw out with wild abandon. But it still comes down to a matter of choice and control, and privacy advocates would be well to emphasize these aspects and insist that laws, regulations, and systems be constructed to allow the power to decide to stay in the hands of the individual.
I may very well write some more personal items on my blog, but I still have control over what goes there. Nowhere will you see me mention details about my employments; one learns not to do so or risk getting "dooced". I may talk about ex-girlfriends at some point or another, but I'm not likely to go into detail about intimate encounters. Maybe I'll make a posting about a drunken college episode but I'm not about to reveal a secret told in confidence.
These sorts of decisions are made and controlled by me and protected by various privacy systems. I may email my wife and talk to her about intimate things, but that doesn't mean I want it broadcasted to the Internet as "something going on in Nathan's life". Nor would I want a private argument in my family to get plastered all over Twitter unless I felt that it was necessary.
Jim states, "Obviously there are different levels of privacy, and the point at which it becomes an issue is different for everyone." He's absolutely correct, and the crux of the issue here is do you have control over it? When a corporate entity publishes your contact information without your consent, that is and should be a violation of your privacy. Yes, I publish my full address and phone numbers on my website, because I feel that it is public knowledge anyway and I am gaining no more risk by doing so. However, even with this already in place, if a company were to publish or sell my address to another, I would be extremely upset.
The problems I see upcoming in the industry and politics is how to properly regulate all of the possible scenarios. Could the company above argue successfully that it found my address on the Internet and, thinking that it was "public knowledge", used it for whatever purposes it wanted? I would hope not, but I cannot be sure, and this will become more and more prevelant as daily details are inserted into places like Twitter, MySpace, and Facebook. Already we've seen a rash of employers Googling their potential hires and using details on places like these for and against the candidates. These issues will only continue to get larger, not smaller, and much legislation will be made about them in the future, I predict.
Posted by Nathan Pralle | June 21, 2007 1:07 PM