On Gender and Programming
|
Is the programming field rife with alpha male behavior to the point that women are turned off by the profession? That's what eWEEK's Darryl K. Taft asks in his article inspired by Ruby on Rails creator David Heinemeier Hansson. Hansson recently blogged about gender and programming in a post entitled "Alpha Males Are Not Keeping Women Out of Programming":
My first observation of this post is that it doesn't seem to be attached to anything. It's just a statement of opinion out of seemingly nowhere. A defense of a position on gender that seems to say, "Hey, everybody, alpha males are all over the place, and mostly not in programming." Not sure I understand the motivation or the position, really. And there are alpha males and females involved, but mostly male. While I agree there is some truth about the introverted aspects of hard-core technologists, I reject the idea that technically savvy people are meek or tame. The introversion, to me, has more to do with having an aptitude for the creative possibilities that can be carried out via a computing machine. There is a logical process to programming that in many instances excludes social encounters. Programming is a human-to-functionality relationship, rather than a human-to-human one. Perhaps that is the turnoff for many women? But let's not kid ourselves. Programming is a highly competitive, male-dominated space. Sometimes it's competitive between businesses and languages, and in other instances it's competitive between peers within the same company. Is that a male or female thing? Not necessarily. Some cultures of programming do involve large teams of people having to work together on the finished product, but the work that has to get done, the majority of it is about you, your coding skills and perhaps your defense of your programming logic. Whether gender is a factor or not, the point to me is this: It doesn't matter. What matters is that women don't enter programming in the same numbers as men. And Hansson doesn't really offer a reason why ... He just says he knows alpha males aren't to blame, and he supports more women getting into the field. The only way to really know is to ask women. Enter the Athena Factor. The Athena Factor is a 2008 study that took a closer look at reasons why women leave tech-related jobs and don't return to them, which the study dubbed "antigens" since they repel women from technology. There are a number of factors, some related to macho-male attitudes, sexual harassment, lack of promotions and something that seemed to me to really stick out: isolation. One of the authors of the study, Sylvia Ann Hewlett, told Computerworld the following:
Is programming an isolating field? It can be if you're not part of a particularly collaborative environment. It kind of leads me to think that the nature of programming as an hourly and daily grind is too isolating for many to overcome. But, ultimately, for the most direct answer, ask women why they don't enter the field. Don't just say it's not because of you if you haven't gone through the trouble of trying to find out. |
For more IT Careers and Workplace News, check out eWeek Careers

Comments (1)
Our society is obsessed with the "status of women." We have gov't funded commissions studying why men may outnumber women in certain academic disciplines when women outnumber men in the vast majority of academic fields of study. A non-sexist approach to the current dilemma, that males are being hurt by the feminization of our culture, would be to have a funded study on why women outnumber males in 75% of academic disciplines, receive more masters degrees and PhDs. But we don't do that. We have to obsess over the few remaining fields and professions where men still outnumber women. Why?
Why aren't we asking why there aren't more male nurses and more male teachers and more male librarians? No one asks that. No one cares. And we shouldn't. Leave people alone.
What we have instead is a victim-society. Everyone has to be a victim. Your not a programmer because you're a victim, and usually the blame is placed upon a WHITE MALE. How sexist and racist is that? Very sexist and racist. Instead of just leaving people alone and being at peace with the fact that most women just do not gel with programming and most men don't jive with being nurses or stewardesses, we convince ourselves that it's the WHITE MALE's fault, that SOMEHOW the WHITE MALE is at it again, discriminating either racially or sexually.
And the entire time the racist/sexist finger is pointed at the WHITE MALE, we nance about funding racist and sexist commissions on why women and minorities aren't more like WHITE MEN.
Insanity. But that's the world we live in.
Posted by Greg | May 19, 2009 1:44 PM