Apple Watch Ziff Davis Enterprise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Sunday, October 19, 2008 1:45 AM/EST

Is Apple's Mac U Pic Worth a Thousand Words?

News Commentary. During last week's Mac notebook launch event, Apple's COO showed a shocking picture: A college lecture hall full of MacBook- and MacBook Pro-toting students.

You'd think that all schools were all going to Macs, based on the photo, which was about as good as marketing gets. Look below for yourself and tell me, isn't that photo a Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer coronary in the making?

arrow.gifGOT A TIP OR RUMOR?

Tim Cook offered up some compelling U.S. statistics to go with the startling picture. "We've surpassed Dell to become the top supplier of notebooks for all of education, with a stunning 39 percent unit share." Apple's chief operating officer then put up figures for an unnamed university—one "that you would recognize"—showing Apple moving from 15 percent in 2002 to 47 percent in 2008. But he didn't say of what the numbers meant. Is that percentage of students using Mac notebooks?

The question to ask: Where was that stunning picture taken? I did some quick research. Looks like the photo was taken in October 2007 at the University of Missouri School of Journalism. There are several, unattributed crops floating around the Web, including Flickr. If you shot this photo, please tell me. I did a screen grab from the video stream Apple post of the event.

Macs at Missouri School of Journalism

They say a picture is worth a thousand words, that each should tell a story. But what is the story here? Tim certainly told one story about the photo, talking about how Apple had worked with universities to make Mac laptops a "choice." But what if there isn't much choice at all?

The Missouri University School of Journalism requires freshman to have a Wi-Fi capable laptop that also can run Microsoft Office. Well, heck, Office should automatically mean Windows. Right? Wrong. Here's some context for that photo, from the school's laptop FAQ:

Q. What brand or model should I buy? A. The faculty has designated Apple Computer as its preferred provider for two primary reasons: (1) Apple's OS X operating system is based on Unix, which makes these computers far less susceptible to viruses than other computers. Viruses are a serious problem on university campuses. (2) Apple MacBook and MacBook Pro computers come bundled with iLife, a suite of applications ideal for learning the basics of photo editing, and audio and video editing. We'll use those programs in several classes. Incoming students will receive information on recommended models and pricing in February of each year.
Q. What if I prefer a Windows-based machine? A. That's an option, but it's one we do not recommend unless you plan to make a career of computer-assisted reporting. By the time you purchase photo, audio and video software for a PC, you probably will have spent more than you would if buying a comparable Apple Computer. Buy a PC if you prefer to do so, but make sure it is wireless and has Microsoft Office. Almost 100 percent of last year's freshmen chose Apple computers.

Go back and read that last sentence again. Because that "almost 100 percent" pretty much sums up the lecture hall photo. It's Mac U.

What's more amazing than the number of Mac portables is the J school's reasons for recommending them—aside from malware concerns: iLife. Creative professionals, such as graphic designers and photographers, have long favored Macs. But journalists? Yeah, journalists. The field has changed in part because of blogging, interactive media and increased emphasis on digital content creation. The differences between print (or Web) and broadcast journalism are disappearing, particularly as more content is produced for the Web. Roles are combining, too, as new tech tools let one journalist or blogger do the job of two, three or four people, just a few years ago.

The bloggers attending this week's Mac laptop event are good examples. Most of them brought computers and still cameras—and many others had video cameras as well. Journalists or bloggers generally produced mixed media coverage that a decade ago only would have written stories. Heck, I did a quick on-site video, too. My Nikon D90 digital camera shoots HD video. An Apple employee held the camera while I introduced the MacBook.

What's the policy at other schools? Is Missouri an aberration or trend? Columbia University is the only Ivy League institution with a journalism school. At first glance, the Journalism School seems to equally support Mac and Windows laptops. But this excerpt from the 2008 Fall Technology Guide favors one over the other:

For students involved in multimedia applications, we recommend using a Mac. Macs come with a variety of basic video, audio and photo editing tools. Intel Macs are also capable of running Windows through either Boot Camp or virtualization software like Parallels or VMware's Fusion. If you plan to purchase a new Mac, the Apple MacBook will be sufficient for most students. The Apple MacBook Pro is recommended for students interested in editing professional video on their laptops.

Now, I know journalists are supposed to strive for impartiality. But what it's going to mean for Windows and Microsoft if the majority of reporters and bloggers come to use Macs? If I were working for Microsoft, I would consider the Missouri J school policy on Macs to be a crisis. Columbia isn't far behind.

How about another one? San Jose School of Journalism and Mass Communications:

Students interested in multimedia may want to choose a MacBook or MacBook Pro, which comes preloaded with the multimedia iLife Suite (iPhoto, iMovie, iDVD, iWeb, and Garageband). Comparable PC applications are available, but are not as well integrated and may require additional purchases.

I could go on, but the point hopefully is obvious. Several prominent J schools are recommending MacBooks or MacBook Pros over Windows laptops, and software is the reason. Who could imagine that $79 iLife—free on new Macs—would be a preferred, even recommended, tool for new media journalism? Apple shows the true value of software done right.

Something else: The half dozen schools I looked at also required Microsoft Office. So where would those Mac recommendations be if there was no Macintosh Office? Please offer your answer in e-mail or the comments.

[Please send your tips or rumors to watchtips at live.com.]

Related Posts:

TrackBack

TrackBack

http://blogs.eweek.com/cgi-bin/mte/mt-tb.cgi/15348

Comments (8)

KenC :

I have to say I was surprised to see that photo make Tim Cook's comments.

As you found out that photo went around the Mac blogosphere, and it was quickly found out, as you did, to be a real photo of the Missouri SOJ. (There was some debate about it being real). What bothered me, is just as you found out, the photo isn't a random University class where almost everyone chose Macs. I think there are four PCs visible. As you noted, it's "recommended", by the school.

As for the Ivy league university, it probably wouldn't be too hard to find the answer, as I recall a couple school papers, Columbia and Princeton, I think, which mentioned the strong growth in Mac use by incoming frosh over the last couple years.

Pages and Keynote produce better documents for me than Word and PowerPoint.

OS X is just susceptible to viruses as Windows. Microsoft's patch management system is superior to Linux, OS X and UNIX. Windows Vista comes with an array of built in multimedia applications for managing and editing of photos, music and video's and they are all free. Most students don't even have to upgrade to Windows Vista to get these applications, you can get them through Windows Live for Windows XP too.

Windows Vista Home Premium and Ultimate includes DVD burning capabilities, so you cab make your own videos in Windows Movie Maker, publish them and burn to DVD using Windows DVD Maker. So there are a lot inaccuracies in the article about recommending a Mac. The same professional industry graphics packages that the Mac uses are also available for Windows. Photoshop, Illustrator, Premier, Flash. Those are the premier packages and they work just as great as they do on the Mac, possibly even better.

@Andre:

There are far more inaccuracies in your brief comments than any 10 of Joe's articles.

Andre's Advocate :

Andre Da Costa wrote, "OS X is just susceptible to viruses as Windows."

And now he will educate us all with some SPECIFIC examples of Mac viruses gone wild...

Andre?

Jon :

A different sort of example. I just graduated from the University of Texas Department of Computer Science graduate program. Almost all research is conducted on Linux and Linux clusters. A major concern for students is the ability to port code from your personal systems to the departmental systems without running into code compatibility issues.

Prior to OS X, graduate students used about a 50/50 split of Windows and Linux notebooks and undergraduates primarily used Windows. After several years of OS X, the faculty and graduate students now split about 50/50 on OS X and Linux with virtually none using Windows. Undergraduates split about equally between all three (Windows/Linux/OS X) with maybe a little less Linux than the other two.

UT Austin is a top 10 Computer Science department that has become virtually a Windows wasteland. If I were Microsoft I would also worry that so many developers and CS researchers were leaving the Windows fold.

chips b malroy :

Andre Da Costa the M$ shill says :

OS X is just susceptible to viruses as Windows.
-----------------------------------------------------Now Andre, that stuff does not pass on MS Watch anymore, do you think I would let your bull pass over here? Even for someone in the employ of Microsoft, how do you hope to pass this one off?

Number of viruses to top 1 million by 2009

http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/040408-number-of-viruses-to-top.html?fsrc=rss-security

Yes folks, read the link, these are all Windows malware, not Mac malware, not linux malware. Its Microsoft Windows that is the typhoid Mary of Operating Systems went it comes to malware, and Andre knows that very well, he is just not honest about it. Andre, you never going get MS MVP this way.

Disclaimer, I am not a Mac user by nature, but I do use Linux and believe that those who are paid by Microsoft should state that. Meaning you, $hill andre.

NN :

The school purchase recommendations are interesting - ten years ago it was a Windows PC that was strongly encouraged in more-or-less exactly the same way. Microsoft really squandered a large lead here.

That said, those recommendations are as much bull**** now as they were then. The functional requirements can be met by either platform, and the extra cost of a Mac is (or should be) a real impediment for a majority of students.

The real question is when we can get a commodity open-source OS that meets those recommendations, because Andre is right about one thing - there's no fundamental reason for OS X to be considered more secure than XP/Vista. And typing this on my MBP, I'm not looking forward to the imminent closing of that perception gap.


Post a Comment

 
 
Advertisement
Advertisement